Physician, Regulate Yourself
If doctors won’t help fix the problems of health care, they shouldn’t be outraged when outsiders try to do it for them.
On Jan. 1, 2020,
a new Medicare policy is scheduled to go into effect that will
eventually require doctors to use a computer algorithm to vet imaging
tests to determine “appropriateness.” If the tests, such as CT scans and
M.R.I.s, do not meet certain “appropriate-use criteria,” Medicare may
not reimburse the cost. Intended to reduce unnecessary imaging, the
policy may penalize doctors who don’t comply by requiring them to get
“prior authorization” before ordering imaging tests in the future — in
other words, to follow another regulation.
Predictably, many doctors
want the policy reversed or at least delayed so that they can come up
with an alternative. They say that there is little evidence that the
regulation will achieve its intended aim. They have concerns about how
the computer algorithm will interact with existing electronic medical
records. More generally, they complain of burdensome regulations,
created largely without physician input, that doctors already must
follow. The new policy, they say, is another intrusion on physicians’
decision-making authority — an authority gained over many years of
difficult training.
These are all
valid points, and yet after almost six years of delays — the law was
passed in 2014 — doctors have not advanced an alternative solution.
Meanwhile, billions of dollars continue to be spent every year on
unnecessary imaging, creating not just financial waste but also real
risks to patients, including excess radiation and false-positive
diagnoses. If doctors can’t or won’t fix a problem that is almost
universally acknowledged in our profession, should we act outraged or
surprised when an outside agency tries to do it for us?
To
be fair, medical specialty societies such as the American Board of
Internal Medicine have published lists of imaging tests that are
generally not beneficial to patients, including M.R.I.s for most lower
back pain and stress tests when there are no signs of heart disease.
Using these criteria, doctors on their own have been able to reduce the
volume of imaging.
However,
publishing lists will take us only so far. I once worked with a
cardiologist who was ordering stress tests on 20-somethings to generate
revenue. Asking doctors to voluntarily reduce imaging along the lines of
what medical societies have proposed will do little to counteract that
kind of excess.
The growth in the
volume of imaging studies is partly a problem of society, driven by the
aging of the population, new technology and the rise of chronic
diseases. But it is also a problem of doctors’ making, driven by forces
such as “defensive” medicine by doctors trying to avoid lawsuits, a
reluctance on the part of doctors (and patients) to accept diagnostic
uncertainty (thus leading to more tests) and simply poor clinical
decisions. No one is better equipped to address these issues than
doctors.
Instead
of having a knee-jerk rejection of all regulations of the medical
profession, doctors should design the regulations themselves, through organizations like the American Medical Association.
But we have been unwilling to assume this responsibility, only to react
with outrage and self-pity when onerous or ineffective regulations are
forced on us.
This is hardly the first
time doctors have behaved this way. Consider what happened after
Medicare was created in 1965 as a social safety net for older Americans.
Health care spending (and doctors’ salaries) quickly skyrocketed.
Reports of waste and fraud were rampant, partly because the government
virtually guaranteed payment for medical services.
To
stem the rise in spending, lawmakers and insurers created managed care,
a new health care financing model that included price controls, fixed
payments and insurer review of the necessity of medical services.
Doctors fought back (and are still fighting). “Passengers who insist on
flying the plane are called hijackers,” Russell Roth, president of the
American Medical Association, acidly remarked in 1976 about the law that
ushered in managed care, without acknowledging that doctors had done
little to rectify the problems that made managed care necessary in the
first place.
Today,
doctors continue to show little inclination to solve health care’s
problems. Most of us are too busy with clinical work. As professionals,
we are notoriously independent and don’t often feel comfortable
organizing or cooperating to achieve common goals. Most physicians don’t
want to engage in the politics and economics of health care. We went to
medical school because we were fascinated with human physiology, not
the body politic.
But if we are going to retain more of the independence we crave, we must
become more active in addressing the problems of health care, some of
which we have created ourselves. Doctors are already raising their
voices on social media and other platforms on issues like gun control
and immigration policy. We need to turn that critical focus on
ourselves. If we don’t want to cede control to “hijackers,” we must be
willing to fly the plane.
It is important to have a health insurance for any individual and you can check your chip eligibility pa and explore best plans for you.
Informative article! Thanks for sharing your valuable knowledge.
ReplyDelete