Four Ways for Republicans to Fix Health Care
They keep searching for a politically safe silver bullet that slays Obamacare and yet leaves everyone happy. That plan doesn’t exist.
By backing a flimsy, state-initiated
lawsuit to throw out the entirety of the Affordable Care Act, President
Trump has made himself and Republican candidates in 2020 vulnerable to
attacks that they want to take health insurance away from millions of
people.
The president compounded the
problem by saying Republicans are going to become the party of health
care without having any plan, let alone a coherent proposal that would
produce better results and could get through Congress. Republicans are
now deeply divided on what should be done, and the president is no help
in setting a course for the party.
Yet
not all is lost on the issue for Republicans. Many Democrats, by
rushing toward a single-payer Medicare for All plan, are being pulled
along by ideological yearnings instead of practical realities. Medicare
for All would upend all current public and private insurance
arrangements, including employer coverage for about 180 million people. Further, even the sponsors admit these plans would require significant middle-class tax increases.
What that means is that the door is open for a responsible Republican plan to improve the nation’s mixed public-private health system. If the party’s leaders were so inclined, they could take advantage of the Democratic overreach by embracing reforms that would build upon what exists and make it work better. Such a conservative reform plan would look something like this:
A Medicaid Compromise
Democrats want universal coverage, but actually most of the roughly 28 million uninsured Americans
are already eligible for public coverage or an employer plan. That’s
not true of 2.5 million people who live in states that have not yet
expanded Medicaid and have incomes below the federal poverty line. They
are ineligible for the A.CA.’s subsidies and can’t afford to buy
coverage on their own. Republicans should embrace a compromise that
allows the non-expansion states to expand Medicaid eligibility to 100
percent of the federal poverty line instead of 138 percent as required
by the A.C.A.
The expansion states could stay at 138 percent if they
wanted to. States should also be given more flexibility to run the
program with less federal interference in return for accepting limits on
overall spending.
Automatic Enrollment
About
19 million uninsured Americans are already eligible for either
Medicaid, subsidized coverage through the A.C.A. or an employer plan.
Instead of creating a new insurance program, Congress should make it
easier for people to enroll automatically. Employers already use
automatic enrollment to expand participation in retirement plans; a
similar process could be used to ensure that workers are signed up for
health insurance. In addition, states could use tax data to identify
individuals who are eligible for insurance subsidies but may not know
it. Eligible individuals could be enrolled in a no-cost plan with the
option of paying a premium for more generous coverage.
Equitable Risk-Sharing
Insurers
in the individual market often have a small pool of customers with
higher annual health expenses than typical ones from group plans. That
drives up premiums for everyone, including enrollees with modest health
care needs. Some states have lowered premiums in the individual
insurance market by providing reinsurance
to insurers or organizing high-risk pools that protect against losses
stemming from the very high-expense cases. By lowering the risk of large
losses, insurers are able to reduce premiums for all of their
customers. That also lowers the cost of premium subsidies provided by
the federal government. To facilitate nationwide adoption of reinsurance
or high-risk pools, some of those federal savings could be offered to
states that establish such mechanisms.
Strengthening Competition and Market Incentives to Control Costs
The most difficult and pressing issue in health care is high and rising costs. Republicans say the answer is stronger market incentives, but they need to back up the rhetoric with concrete reforms. To begin, Congress needs to place an upper limit on the tax break for employer-provided health care to promote more efficient health insurance.The Federal Trade Commission should more aggressively examine business deals that create de facto monopoly providers in local health care markets. Both parties want Medicare to emphasize value instead of volume in the provision of care. To achieve that goal, beneficiaries need clear information on the cost of their care, and they should share in the savings when they choose high-quality, low-cost providers. More broadly, consumers should be able to see the all-in prices they will pay for high-volume procedures. Finally, Republicans should encourage more competition among drug manufacturers and limit abuses that extend monopolistic pricing for years beyond what patent law is supposed to provide. All of these reforms are controversial but crucial to moving the health care system away from the wasteful approaches that drive up costs for everyone.
Republicans keep searching for a politically safe silver bullet that slays Obamacare and yet leaves everyone happy. That plan doesn’t exist.
But voters aren’t looking for a miracle. They would settle for solid progress. It’s time for Republicans to become the party of responsible health care.
Do you want to know more information about the virtual doctor then please contact us in the comment section and send your queries.
Comments
Post a Comment